Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031
Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

MSMQ

Post Reply
Underground
Posts: 2
Joined: 2014-02-07 14:54

MSMQ

Post by Underground »

Is there anything in this version that might affect another application on the same server utilizing MSMQ?

Essentially we shut down UltraVNC service and broke the other application, started it back up and it started working again. Don't see any direct references, but it makes extensive use of message queues.

I was just wondering if it might be disabling a shared resource?
Top
Bonji
100
100
Posts: 339
Joined: 2008-05-13 14:54

Re: MSMQ

Post by Bonji »

Does MSMQ stand for Microsoft Message Queuing?

I'm not aware of uVNC breaking other applications beyond them trying to share the same port #, but this scenario is backwards from that. It sounds very odd MSMQ would break because uVNC is no longer running.

I would just make sure MSMQ is not trying to use port 5900 in any way or change uVNC's port number to something different.
-Ben
Top
Underground
Posts: 2
Joined: 2014-02-07 14:54

Re: MSMQ

Post by Underground »

Yes. A port conflict was the other main thing I was looking at.

I haven't specifically seen anything yet, but I haven't had a lot of time to look at it.

Thanks!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Olders”