At the moment I'm using 3.2, which seems to include ultravnc 1.0.9.4. I just downloaded 1.0.9.6 and read on the site the following :
1.0.9.4 ( Bad build, never use it !!!!!!!! )
Is the version included a special version of 1.0.9.4 or should I better use the 1.0.9.6 I downloaded ?
Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Wich version ?
Wich version ?
Last edited by Stefke on 2011-04-11 12:33, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Wich version ?
ChunkVNC 3.2 has been tested throughly so you shouldn't expect to have any problems when used normally.
Replacing the Server with 1.0.9.6 will increase the size of InstantSupport unless you use a resource editor to remove unneeded stuff (java, icons, etc...)
Replacing the Server with 1.0.9.6 will increase the size of InstantSupport unless you use a resource editor to remove unneeded stuff (java, icons, etc...)
http://www.chunkvnc.com - ChunkVNC - Free PC Remote control with the Open Source UltraVNC wrapper InstantSupport!
Re: Wich version ?
Thanks for the explanation. I went ahead and replaced it anyway (that was before I read your explanation). Filesize is about 300kb bigger. Not a big deal really with the speeds I'm dealing with.