Thanks for the suggestion; however, if I'm forced to run two different VNC clients, then I'll just run uVNC and rVNC...
I like uVNC, tightVNC focused too much on JPEG compression and I didn't like the results. uVNC did everything I wanted and great speed, so I was hoping not to change again.
If Tight has the option to turn off JPEG and has File transfer and is faster than rVNC and can do RA2 security -- then
maybe...
![Hmmm? :|](./images/smilies/_icon_neutral.gif)