Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Better Vista support for SC ??? (SOLVED in server 1.0.5.7)

Single Click discussions / bugs
Post Reply
User avatar
JDaus
Friend of UVNC
Friend of UVNC
Posts: 537
Joined: 2007-03-17 11:00
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Better Vista support for SC ??? (SOLVED in server 1.0.5.7)

Post by JDaus »

*EDIT* [topic=15126]developers added this feature into 1.0.5.7[/topic] ...

So you want better Vista support ??? read on

out of all the "Addons" that i have seen, the one's that work best use the newest server, but it has one BIG problem ... it doesn't close after connections finish ...

to see better support for SC connections in server (whatever addon you use), add you voice to [topic=14808]this post in feature requests[/topic]



With this minor (i believe) addition to server, we can use it in place of SC II application for many already established SC solutions.
Last edited by JDaus on 2009-04-21 23:53, edited 2 times in total.
ask a silly question and remain a fool for 5 minutes...
don't ask, and remain a fool for life - JDaus 2003

without imperfections, neither you nor i would exist - Steven Hawkins
__
JD
SCPrompt - OpenSource Free Remote Screen\Desktop Sharing Solution
SecureTech.com.au
User avatar
JDaus
Friend of UVNC
Friend of UVNC
Posts: 537
Joined: 2007-03-17 11:00
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Want Better Vista support for SC ???

Post by JDaus »

doesn't anybody want better support for vista in there SC apps ???
Why is it so important for the app to close?
When I'm done, I simply right click the "server" on the remote end, and close it. This terminates my connection.

I'd agree this is the "right" way to do it, but do we have to have it?
every addon SC application (nitro's, scprompt, scprompt2009, vnc2me & manu more) use the old SC application via the command line. (some use already use the server)

if we want to use the server as an interchangable item for SC, then we need it to behave like SC, the problem is it doesn't.

when a connection problem occurs in the SC application, the application closes.
when a connection problem occurs in the latest SERVER application, the application remains running.

the minor (?) change i propose would allow SERVER to act like SC in many addon applications, and would allow the latest server to be interchanged for SC in MOST addon apps available todate ...
ask a silly question and remain a fool for 5 minutes...
don't ask, and remain a fool for life - JDaus 2003

without imperfections, neither you nor i would exist - Steven Hawkins
__
JD
SCPrompt - OpenSource Free Remote Screen\Desktop Sharing Solution
SecureTech.com.au
networkn
20
20
Posts: 33
Joined: 2007-01-10 22:12

Re: Want Better Vista support for SC ???

Post by networkn »

I just want ANYTHING that works! If this is what it takes, I'm all for it.
Post Reply