After more 2 000 000 (two million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is always welcome

2025-12-14: 1.7.1.X-dev release builds need tests and feedback: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38134

2025-12-02: We need help: English Wikipedia UltraVNC page has been requested to deletion: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38127
Any help is welcome to improve the UltraVNC page and/or to comment on the Wikipedia Talk page

2025-05-06: Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

2023-09-21: Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome
Feedback is welcome

SCIII doesn’t work on Windows 95 and NT4 (solved)

SC <-> Proxy <-> Repeater <-> Proxy <-> Viewer
Post Reply
Greta
20
20
Posts: 44
Joined: 2007-05-15 07:32

SCIII doesn’t work on Windows 95 and NT4 (solved)

Post by Greta »

Why doesn’t SCIII not work on Windows 95 and Windows NT4 Workstation? The "normal" SC works very well on these workstations. But when you start SC enter an ID and click on connect the program crass. Or is there something else that you have to install also to get for example ssl working on these machines.

[mod=494,1193704956]added solved to title[/mod]
Last edited by Greta on 2007-10-30 00:42, edited 1 time in total.
redge
1000
1000
Posts: 6797
Joined: 2004-07-03 17:05
Location: Switzerland - Geneva

Re: SCIII doesn’t work on Windows 95 and NT4

Post by redge »

the 128 bit ssl should be installed (encryption pack of MS)
UltraVNC 1.0.9.6.1 (built 20110518)
Windows OS: XP Home + Vista Business + 7 Home
Only experienced user, not developer
Greta
20
20
Posts: 44
Joined: 2007-05-15 07:32

Re: SCIII doesn’t work on Windows 95 and NT4

Post by Greta »

Yes you right. That was the problem :oops:
Thanks.
Post Reply