Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

UltraVnc repeater Update june 2011

Post Reply
Nick_ua
8
8
Posts: 18
Joined: 2010-06-16 18:10

UltraVnc repeater Update june 2011

Post by Nick_ua »

I started UltraVnc repeater Update june 2011 on the server
And by configuring Only allow ID:
a lot of ID numbers (56) after the setup program does not start distributer.exe :surprise:

question how many ID numbers can support function (Only allow ID:)?

thanks 8)
zinger
Posts: 3
Joined: 2011-06-25 09:43
Location: Kiev, Ukraine

Re: UltraVnc repeater Update june 2011

Post by zinger »

Nick_ua
Are you from Ukraine? Your automatic translation of question is hardly understandable.
Write me to private in Russian, and I'll try to help you.
Same in Russian:
Привет. Я так понял что ты из Украины. Я тоже.
Твой вопрос совсем не понятен. Видно что ты переводил автоматом. Напиши мне в личку. Попробую помочь перевести.
zinger
Posts: 3
Joined: 2011-06-25 09:43
Location: Kiev, Ukraine

Re: UltraVnc repeater Update june 2011

Post by zinger »

Hello all.
I have translated from Russian to English the question of Nick_ua:

I am using "UltraVnc repeater Update june 2011".
How many ID's I can add to "Only allow ID:" ?
When I added 56 ID's to this option then distributer.exe do not run after restart.
michael70
Posts: 2
Joined: 2011-07-23 13:48

Re: UltraVnc repeater Update june 2011

Post by michael70 »

Thanks, zinger for the translation.
Prisma
100
100
Posts: 320
Joined: 2005-10-27 15:50

Re: UltraVnc repeater Update june 2011

Post by Prisma »

Hmmmm... I'd say, for your assumed purpose the checkbox "Use comment to check viewer access" could help. In comment.txt up to 1000 entries are possible (manually edited, not via the webGUI).

Or do you want to prevent servers from connecting? This would be a feature request for a checkbox "Use comment to check SERVER access". To my mind, this checkbox would make as much sense as the current implemented checkbox. And I already wondered why it was done that way and not vice versa... Rudi?
Post Reply