After more 2 000 000 (two million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is always welcome
2025-12-05: Celebrating the 23th anniversary of the UltraVNC (26th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38130
2025-12-03: Could you please complete our poll/survey? Renaming UltraVNC files and service to be more clear: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38128
There was a problem to vote, it is solved now! Thanks in advance!
2025-12-02: We need help: English Wikipedia UltraVNC page has been requested to deletion: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38127
Any help is welcome to improve the UltraVNC page and/or to comment on the Wikipedia Talk page
2025-05-06: Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078
2023-09-21: Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome
Feedback is welcome
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is always welcome
2025-12-05: Celebrating the 23th anniversary of the UltraVNC (26th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38130
2025-12-03: Could you please complete our poll/survey? Renaming UltraVNC files and service to be more clear: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38128
There was a problem to vote, it is solved now! Thanks in advance!
2025-12-02: We need help: English Wikipedia UltraVNC page has been requested to deletion: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38127
Any help is welcome to improve the UltraVNC page and/or to comment on the Wikipedia Talk page
2025-05-06: Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078
2023-09-21: Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome
Feedback is welcome
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Maintenance
Maintenance
Is any one maintaining this? I rather suspect, considering the vulnerabilities, that it might be nice to do this with a gina stub
Re: Maintenance
Huh? I thought this was an integral part of the distribution and was being maintained as a matter of course?
Re: Maintenance
Perhaps maintaining is the wrong word. MSLogon 2 uses NTLM, which Microsoft has advised not to use. It would be best to use Kerberos if available to connect to an AD domain. Also, I had thought that the original implementer (Mascha?) had left for other pastures...
Re: Maintenance
Wow, you seem to go way back! 
Yeah, now that you mention it, it always did seem a little "quaint" the way MSLogon prefers using local groups first (though that does make it fit well with home LAN users). Honestly I didn't know it lacked Kerberos support; I'm surprised. But MSLogon's not a feature I use ordinarily.
In short then, yes, I would agree an update would be valuable.
Yeah, now that you mention it, it always did seem a little "quaint" the way MSLogon prefers using local groups first (though that does make it fit well with home LAN users). Honestly I didn't know it lacked Kerberos support; I'm surprised. But MSLogon's not a feature I use ordinarily.
In short then, yes, I would agree an update would be valuable.
