Testversion viewer.
In this version the first cursor shape is ignored.
(perhaps this trick avoid it )
Sybols saved for analyse.
http://www.uvnc.eu/download/vncviewer_crashtest711.zip
Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
vncviewer.exe crashes on first few connects, then it works
-
Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6863
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
-
nihartjones11
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 2010-11-03 13:50
Re: vncviewer.exe crashes on first few connects, then it wor
Hello Rudi, sfhub, and all others,
At this point, I must offer my sincerest apologies. I have apparently misled myself (and you) into thinking that 1.0.9.2 was still problematic. I am indeed in error and I apologize for handing you a red herring about it.
Something you said gave me an idea, so I double-checked. Every time the viewer crashed, it would make a record of it in the Win7 Action Center, along with the crash details. It never made a minidump or anything (at least that I could find) but the crash details in the Action Center had all the info needed... the Application Version.
In all instances where I thought it was 1.0.9.2 crashing, it was actually 1.0.8.2!! And the crash-details recorded by the Action Center prove it. When I pulled a shortcut to your custom-build and then cut-and-pasted my command-line options into the Target edit-box, the c&p operation also included the full path from the old shortcut - which was pointing to C:\Program Files\UltraVNC\vncviewer.exe - the original 1.0.8.2 file. I was clicking on the new shortcut, but executing the old image.
So... I have retested, extensively, with 1.0.9.2 (and made sure about running the proper image) and I now agree with you and sfhub that there is no problem with 1.0.9.2. Not one viewer-crash with it, and I attempted dozens of times.
Again, I apologize to you, and everyone, for the misdirection, and I commend you and all others here for your responsiveness and speed of replies. Keep up your excellent work!
At this point, I must offer my sincerest apologies. I have apparently misled myself (and you) into thinking that 1.0.9.2 was still problematic. I am indeed in error and I apologize for handing you a red herring about it.
Something you said gave me an idea, so I double-checked. Every time the viewer crashed, it would make a record of it in the Win7 Action Center, along with the crash details. It never made a minidump or anything (at least that I could find) but the crash details in the Action Center had all the info needed... the Application Version.
In all instances where I thought it was 1.0.9.2 crashing, it was actually 1.0.8.2!! And the crash-details recorded by the Action Center prove it. When I pulled a shortcut to your custom-build and then cut-and-pasted my command-line options into the Target edit-box, the c&p operation also included the full path from the old shortcut - which was pointing to C:\Program Files\UltraVNC\vncviewer.exe - the original 1.0.8.2 file. I was clicking on the new shortcut, but executing the old image.
So... I have retested, extensively, with 1.0.9.2 (and made sure about running the proper image) and I now agree with you and sfhub that there is no problem with 1.0.9.2. Not one viewer-crash with it, and I attempted dozens of times.
Again, I apologize to you, and everyone, for the misdirection, and I commend you and all others here for your responsiveness and speed of replies. Keep up your excellent work!