Why not a HTTP tunneling option in SC to cope with very restrictive firewalls?
The HTTP tunneling could work in a way that it POSTs and GETs to/from a CGI script on a HTTP server.
Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Suggestion: HTTP tunneling option
Re: Suggestion: HTTP tunneling option
yes its nice feauture i was thinking too
not only for SC but for entire UVNC
if you need it for now, a work around you can make a batch with gnu http tunnel
http://www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html
i.e. a batch start executes port mapping , then executes SC..
not only for SC but for entire UVNC
if you need it for now, a work around you can make a batch with gnu http tunnel
http://www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html
i.e. a batch start executes port mapping , then executes SC..
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6867
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
Re: Suggestion: HTTP tunneling option
Then you better use https and the connect....only drawback is that the viewer
need to listen on port 443.
This require no special cgi, and work over a corporate proxy
At least when the data is encrypted so he can filter rfb
need to listen on port 443.
This require no special cgi, and work over a corporate proxy
At least when the data is encrypted so he can filter rfb