After more 2 000 000 (two million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is always welcome

2025-12-14: 1.7.1.X-dev release builds need tests and feedback: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38134

2025-12-02: We need help: English Wikipedia UltraVNC page has been requested to deletion: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38127
Any help is welcome to improve the UltraVNC page and/or to comment on the Wikipedia Talk page

2025-05-06: Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

2023-09-21: Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome
Feedback is welcome

InstantSupportCompiler not valid

Simple, Free, Open Source UltraVNC Wrapper Supporting Windows and Mac OSX
Post Reply
anthrax79
Posts: 7
Joined: 2009-10-25 04:15

InstantSupportCompiler not valid

Post by anthrax79 »

Pardon me if I have missed something. I just started using ChunkVNC and wanted to play with the 3.1g version to see how the re-branding might help me. I ran the ChunkVNCRemoteSupport_Install_3.1g.exe to install the application. When I click the "Compile - ChunkVNC Remote Support" option in the menu I get this error

C:\Program Files\ChunkVNC\InstantSupportCompiler.exe is not a valid Win32 application.

I am running Windows 7 32
User avatar
supercoe
400
400
Posts: 1732
Joined: 2009-07-20 21:27
Location: Walker, MN

Re: InstantSupportCompiler not valid

Post by supercoe »

3.1g is a fork of the main code by Rat, I'd suggest you ask him in his thread:
[topic=17342][/topic]
ChunkVNC - Free PC Remote control with the Open Source UltraVNC wrapper InstantSupport!
anthrax79
Posts: 7
Joined: 2009-10-25 04:15

Re: InstantSupportCompiler not valid

Post by anthrax79 »

Opps, I must have hit new topic instead of reply... sorry.
Post Reply