After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Customizing Chat

Any features you would like to see in UltraVNC? Propose it here
Post Reply
ama_fullstep

Customizing Chat

Post by ama_fullstep »

Hello,

I wish to provide a chat to my UltraVNC users, but I would need three things in order to implement it:

- The possilibity to change the current nickname based in the machine name to another one based in certain variable or property from the control or VB program.

- The possibility to deactivate the security message at the beggining of the chat window because all of the chat transfers are going to take place in the server itself.

. The possibility to share a chat beetween three or more users connected to the same server.

Is there any possiblity to do this three things with the current implementation of UltraVNC?

If not, do you consider them for future implementations?

Regards,

Alfredo
Post Reply