Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

SC incompatible with Chicken of the VNC (Mac)

Single Click discussions / bugs
Post Reply
majid
Posts: 1
Joined: 2005-12-10 12:08
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Contact:

SC incompatible with Chicken of the VNC (Mac)

Post by majid »

I would like to use SC to support my unfortunate Windows-using family from my Mac. The latest version of Chicken of the VNC (a Mac client) supports listening on port 5500. Unfortunately, when I try connecting from SC, SC breaks off the connection.

I ran tcpdump, and found the following exchange:

SC->CotVNC: RFB 003.016\n
CotVNC->SC: RFB 003.008\n
SC->CotVNC: Hex 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x01
CotVNC->SC: TCP ack, no data

then nothing.

CotVNC works fine with UltraVNC 1.0. I wonder what's going on. The RealVNC RFB spec is of little help as it does not mention versions 3.16 (or the version 3.6 that is used in handshakes between CotVNC and UltraVNC 1.0). It looks like SC is trying to send a pre-3.7 security type word even though it agreed to serve up to 3.16 including 3.8.
redge
1000
1000
Posts: 6797
Joined: 2004-07-03 17:05
Location: Switzerland - Geneva

Post by redge »

Rudi De Vos wrote:SC does not follow the rfb protocol.
To minimize size some code has been removed and replaced by smaller parts.

Only works with our viewer
source:
[topic=3311][/topic]
UltraVNC 1.0.9.6.1 (built 20110518)
OS Win: xp home + vista business + 7 home
only experienced user, not developer
Post Reply