After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

SC Firewalls/Routers

Any features you would like to see in UltraVNC? Propose it here
Post Reply
rca221
8
8
Posts: 11
Joined: 2005-07-28 22:45

SC Firewalls/Routers

Post by rca221 »

My extremely disparate wish list is to have SC make a connection when both sides are behind a firewall and or router so that the remote side does not required firewall intervention. The remote side users are very concerned and do not understand just what they are giving permissions for. I would like to see SC become a truely single click for the remote side users. I thought a repeater would solve this remote side firewall intervention but does not appear to do so. This is the biggest thing on my wish list that is for sure. HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thedarkener
8
8
Posts: 18
Joined: 2005-09-30 17:03
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Contact:

??

Post by thedarkener »

I'm not sure what you mean by the repeater not providing this functionality - that's exactly what it does (Mode 2). Both viewer and server create an OUTGOING connection to the publically accessable repeater, which joins the two ends together.

SERVER -> NAT -> INTERNET/REPEATER <- NAT <- VIEWER

No port forwarding, no security issues unless you are under very strict control where outgoing connections are restricted. There really isn't anything you could do about that, though. If your users are complaining that Norton Internet Security is asking them permission to allow an outgoing conection, it's not like SC can get around that.
Post Reply