After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Using HTTP instead of 5900

Any features you would like to see in UltraVNC? Propose it here
Post Reply
Frank Carius

Using HTTP instead of 5900

Post by Frank Carius »

Hello folks.
i like VNC an know it for more than 4 years now. Today i have seen UltraVNCSC (SingleClick) and the option to use a Repeater. Great but there is one important ting missing.

I'm normally behind a real firewall (not only a NAT Router)
and the system i want to control is also behint a Firewall.
So i need a repeater. Thats no problem, i can do that.

But I'm still looking for an option to use HTTP/HTTPS instead of port 5900. I know there are commercial products out(PCVisit, NetViewer etc)
Currently i'm investigating to use HTTPORT to tunnel VNC5900 over HTTP. but i would prefer to have a native implementation in UltraVNC. That would be gread.


Frank (ultravnc@.removethat.carius.de)
Top
User avatar
Rudi De Vos
Admin & Developer
Admin & Developer
Posts: 6952
Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
Contact:
Contact Rudi De Vos

Post by Rudi De Vos »

Check
http://forum.ultravnc.net/viewforum.php?f=23

Still in early Beta..
Top
Frank Carius

VNC over HTTP

Post by Frank Carius »

Great stuff.
Even if its beta, its important to know, that you are on the right way :-)
It was funny, that searching to forum for for HTTP does not give a result. Maybe you should put a "currently in beta"-Page with such information to the web :-)

i'll play with the beta and give you feedback.

Thanks Frank
Top
victor_knight
8
8
Posts: 29
Joined: 2005-10-03 08:19
Contact:
Contact victor_knight

Re: Using HTTP instead of 5900

Post by victor_knight »

Frank Carius wrote:Hello folks.
i like VNC an know it for more than 4 years now. Today i have seen UltraVNCSC (SingleClick) and the option to use a Repeater. Great but there is one important ting missing.

I'm normally behind a real firewall (not only a NAT Router)
and the system i want to control is also behint a Firewall.
So i need a repeater. Thats no problem, i can do that.

But I'm still looking for an option to use HTTP/HTTPS instead of port 5900. I know there are commercial products out(PCVisit, NetViewer etc)
Currently i'm investigating to use HTTPORT to tunnel VNC5900 over HTTP. but i would prefer to have a native implementation in UltraVNC. That would be gread.


Frank (ultravnc@.removethat.carius.de)
You can try using the SSH port 22. I use it in conjunction with some batch scripts and this program (Reverse HTTP Starter).

see VNC-Related products and look [topic=4454][/topic]


[mod=494,1128389069]policy of UltraVNC forum, removed url to commercial product and redirected to vnc-related products[/mod]
Last edited by victor_knight on 2005-10-04 01:24, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Feature requests”