Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
SC Creator Not Working
I think this is a perfect example why there should be an executable version of the "Creator"
I needed to compile so changes today, but it has been down the entire business day without any acknowledgment.
Of course this isnt commercial software that we can count on but hey wouldnt it be nice if you at least knew if the entire project died you could still generate an executable?
I needed to compile so changes today, but it has been down the entire business day without any acknowledgment.
Of course this isnt commercial software that we can count on but hey wouldnt it be nice if you at least knew if the entire project died you could still generate an executable?
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6863
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
The person with ip 62.219.230.28 tried to hack the webserver
Our creator script has erased the SC content has consequence of this attempt. (second creator)
The second creator will be offline for another day as a need to check
the file consistency
Possible we will also mapout the 62.219.x.x range for access.
edit
I don't think it was actual a hack...
Checking the loggings it seems that something in the name triggert
the script to erase the content of the creator directory.
Our creator script has erased the SC content has consequence of this attempt. (second creator)
The second creator will be offline for another day as a need to check
the file consistency
Possible we will also mapout the 62.219.x.x range for access.
edit
I don't think it was actual a hack...
Checking the loggings it seems that something in the name triggert
the script to erase the content of the creator directory.
Last edited by Rudi De Vos on 2005-06-06 22:37, edited 1 time in total.
Offline Creator
Anonymous wrote:I think this is a perfect example why there should be an executable version of the "Creator"
I Agree, I did get hold of one before but does it work with the new version?????
Re: Offline Creator
I had the same complaint, but there is a batch file to do the creation, (also a version of the script I modified, see the following thread)Anonymous wrote:I Agree, I did get hold of one before but does it work with the new version?????Anonymous wrote:I think this is a perfect example why there should be an executable version of the "Creator"
[topic=1902][/topic]
It works well once it's set up, when a new version shows up it's simply a case of putting the new files in the right directories and away you go.
I am working on an executable to do the creation with editors for the text, buttons and click to start items and dialogs to load in the bmp and icons, but it's a pretty low priority (surprise, surprise. Paying work for clients comes first, so it only gets worked on when I "have time" or am frustrated with the clients and/or their requests...).
USER is a four letter word....