Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

SC based on RC20 is online

Single Click discussions / bugs
Post Reply
User avatar
Rudi De Vos
Admin & Developer
Admin & Developer
Posts: 6862
Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
Contact:

SC based on RC20 is online

Post by Rudi De Vos »

Code has been recovered and merged with RC20.
(code will be online next weekend)

Creator (use second box for RC20)
http://uvnc.com/index.php?section=19

!!!! tested by 1 person, me :D !!!!
A lot of code was manual restored, errors are possible.

SC use the noreg 116 plugin

[mod=2,1119896102]Removed \"sticky\" flag[/mod]
Last edited by Rudi De Vos on 2005-03-14 20:40, edited 1 time in total.
ipsec
Former moderator
Former moderator
Posts: 565
Joined: 2004-09-20 18:56
Contact:

Post by ipsec »

Cool.

I will have to test the noreg option with the dsm :-) That will be monday when I get back to work :-)
njc
8
8
Posts: 24
Joined: 2004-05-27 22:02
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by njc »

Rudi,

Version information incorrect!

File Version reports 1.0.0.18
About Box reports 1.0.0 TEST19
Paul Benn
netwolf
40
40
Posts: 112
Joined: 2004-05-13 11:33

Post by netwolf »

njc wrote:Rudi,

Version information incorrect!

File Version reports 1.0.0.18
About Box reports 1.0.0 TEST19
Now that you mention it: the version number in the winvnc.rc file also states 19.6 after the latest update :wink:
redge
1000
1000
Posts: 6797
Joined: 2004-07-03 17:05
Location: Switzerland - Geneva

Post by redge »

tested successfully, work very fine ! :D

thank a lot for your great work Rudi
UltraVNC 1.0.9.6.1 (built 20110518)
OS Win: xp home + vista business + 7 home
only experienced user, not developer
Guest

Post by Guest »

Is it compatiable with the following version of viewer?

Viewer RC18
Viewer RC19.2
Viewer RC19.5
Viewer RC20.2
Viewer RC20.3 or +

Please advise. Thanks.
Luca Inghirami

Post by Luca Inghirami »

Extraorinary work!
5 minute to test, try and have it to work.

2 little questions

First, where I can find a docs about all option to use in the command line of HOST section? Are all the same of WinVnc?

And second, has anyone think that may be useful have the possibility to add a special HOST that permit the user type in manually the IP and port to connect so You can assist it also if You are in a location not preview in the list compiled?

Actually I use a program made by myself that use UltraVNC to do the same things that SC do but more the user has this possibility so I can assist they also when I'm out in any location where I can use an internet connection with my portable or any other PC internet connected where is installed a viewer or I can install it.

luca.inghirami@poste.it
Ares
Former moderator
Former moderator
Posts: 183
Joined: 2005-03-16 18:42

Post by Ares »

Luca Inghirami wrote:And second, has anyone think that may be useful have the possibility to add a special HOST that permit the user type in manually the IP and port to connect so You can assist it also if You are in a location not preview in the list compiled?
I second that suggestion! Though, I've suggested it before and I don't think they want that. But eh, we might have a shot if we pool our suggesting-ability ;)


-Ares
Ares
Former moderator
Former moderator
Posts: 183
Joined: 2005-03-16 18:42

Post by Ares »

Luca Inghirami wrote:You can assist it also if You are in a location not preview in the list compiled?
Oh, by the way, what I do is set up a repeater. You can make an outgoing connection to your repeater from anywhere, and so can the SC client. So this way you can still work from anywhere. =)


-Ares
cheaha
40
40
Posts: 94
Joined: 2004-06-23 20:42
Location: R.D.H. Headquarters

Nat2Nat

Post by cheaha »

Nat2Nat would allow for this possibility too, but unlike the repeater won't slow down the connection as no traffic has to be relayed except the initial connection.

That's why I'm being so persistant about getting Nat2Nat in SC. It would be the BOMB!!
Last edited by cheaha on 2005-04-22 14:45, edited 1 time in total.
Luca Inghirami

Repeater or Nat2Nat ?

Post by Luca Inghirami »

I have a look to repeater and n2n.
I never used all the two ! Sorry.

But in case of n2n I understud that the user and me nust run manually NVC NSC before the connection ( and I dubt that the user can do it cooctly if I can not call by line the command!) but You can connect directly from everywhere whithout traffic redirection.

In case of Repeater You nust set up in Your server a repeater running in mode II waiting in special dedicated port for an inverse server calling with an ID and a viewer listening with the same ID. It is all ok but I do not understud what I must write in the HOST line do obtain that, may be:

-connect myrepeaterip:5501 ID.1234

or what ? and the viewer ?

vncviever -listen myrepeaterip:5901 ID.1234

or

vsnviever -proxy myrepeater:5901 -listen ID.1234

can You suggest the configuration to test ?

Luca Inghirami
kronos5150

I can't seem to get SC to work with Repeater Mode II

Post by kronos5150 »

Please offer suggested config to repeater mode with sc client or maybe just a commandline switch to specify repeater ID ...

Thanks,
Post Reply