UltraVNC

OK, still the same problem. And the post linked to does not exist.

Is there a special plugin for XP x64 released somewhere? One that is compatible with a 32 bit viewer using the (standard 32 bit) plugin?

It also doesn't start on XP x64 Edition. Pretty sad, in my opinion, since this is the best OS Microsoft ever released thus far,.

OneClick 2.0.9.1 has been released. http://www.advantig.com/oneclick -or- http://www.vnchelpdesk.com --------- Changes --------- Version 2.0.9.1 ---------------------------------- - Added shortcut to desktop to force a reconnect to the technician. Yet another one of those badly tested software ...

..

..

What is the least bandwidth intensive method of use for the current latest UltraVNC release? That is to say: Not the fastest one, but the method that saves bandwidth.

I'm on a HSDPA connection with very limited bandwidth. If I go over a certain monthly limit, I need to pay extra.

Same problems here. I have a connection entirely functional, from XP 32 bit viewerside to XP 64bit serverside. Both sides have the same key and plugin version (latest from comcast page). This is from the debug log at serverside; Fri Dec 19 00:06:33 2008 .\vncserver.cpp : removing unauthorised client ...

Followed the setup to the letter, doesn't work with
XP x86 viewer to XP x64 server using the latest available releases.

Without the plugin, all is fine.

I have UltraVNC working stable as a rock on Windows XP Professional 64-bit Edition , here is how I achieved it: Make sure you don't have any older versions of VNC running. Uninstall and clear the service entries in the registry if needed. Go to the downloadpage http://www.uvnc.com/download/ and get ...

> Does not function... reboot required Is the syntax different from RealVNC ? It used to be: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\ORL\WinVNC3] "AuthHosts"="-:+192.168.1" so the asterix wasn't used.. How about it for the ini ? ## Just tested this and the syntax is exactly like for RealVNC ## except you don ...

Can someone port this driver to be properly installed in x64 systems? Shouldn't be so hard to have it run in XP x64, because its only requirement is that it's installed with the x64 paths/protocols/requirements. The OS simply runs the 32 bit apps fine after that. http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver ...

Just try to be less rude and upsetting when talking about the work of others Oh give me a break! Be glad I'm even IN this forum once or twice a year. It seems the PC Helpware project barely has any development going. You people should check the length of your toes. If you can't do the time, don't ...

Yes, I've seen it. It's way too complex for many users who don't need all the extras. Plus the packages aren't linked directly there and don't include all the latest dlls and such. I did. This is my Read Me First content included in the package: I n s t a l l a t i o n : - First edit the files in ...

It's here: http://jthz.com/puter/software/uvnc/ Unpack the zipped folder. Then read the "! Read Me First" txt before use, it has all necessary installation instructions. This includes all the latest files needed for simple direct-connection one listener singleclick remote support without repeater ...

If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. To make matters worse, I just tested PcHelpWare, and I have some results: I've worked with VNC, RealVNC, TightVNC, UltraVNC for years, ever since the start, almost 10 years ago, and only started using encryption with SC almost 2 years ago. To be very ...

TWF is actually TWoFish, a rather strange abbreviation.

We didn't write our own encryption, but used the encryption
provided by the commercial Intel ipp lib.

One could wonder how safe it is, then. The NSA or MI* or AIVD will not find it hard to decrypt, is my guess.

For simple one-listener no-repeater direct-connection SC use I have an updated other package here: http://jthz.com/puter/software/uvnc/ Unpack the zipped folder. Then read the "! Read Me First" txt before use, it has all necessary installation instructions. This includes all the latest files needed ...

Is the old FTP interface added to PCHelpWare?
And if not, why not?

Again: What version of SC to use, what version of UltraVNC to use with that?

None of the links work there, plus it doesn't mention which online compiler to use, nor where it is. It also doesn't mention which version of UltraVNC is compatible. For me UVNC 1.02 didn't work anymore with SC. I have no idea why. Could someone update the SC compiler code so that it will work with ...

bump..

You should also mention that the FTP in SC is a much better interface.

For PCHelpWare they use explorer and copy-paste for it.

You people should update your links sometime, it's a total mess! I see this exists now: http://www.pchelpware.com/creator but it is still unclear where the online compiler for SC is, and which version to use. What is SCIII and what is SCII? If you give visitors a choice, you need to realize to ...

...

3. No, you can open 2 explorers (local and remote). The copy paste allow to copy files/dirctory from one explorere to the other. Well, better mention that on top at the front of the website! The FTP interface was exactly what it should be, the way it was for SC uvnc. SC and pchelpware needs a ...

In your online manual on the site I read: "-> The Viewer PC needs to have an official ip address" who writes these manuals? What is an "official ip address" ? I see a part 1 part 2 part 3 and part 4, but unfortunately, none of them make much sense at all. It's a load of info, without any ...

I would have to agree with Scott. I've already noticed how there was not 1 functional manual for SC, there are many sub-manuals, but not one is actually fully tested and functional, especially when using encryption. It begins at the choices for compiling it. It is totally unclear which of the ...

Pchelpware is current active in development, it has most of the options of SC II/III. Why confuse things even more? Just create a new online compiler for the latest stable version and you're done. All the renaming will not help. Users need to know 2 things: - What version of UltraVNC viewer needs ...

Rudi De Vos wrote:Current SC version require the use of the DSM plugins.

Next version will have embedded 254bit encryption.

When will it be ready, you think?

Could someone please explain in detail - Which version of what files is used for this to work. - What SC version is created ? - What viewer version needs to be used ? - What plugin file version needs to be used ? - How should the plugin be called, and where should it be installed or located, and ...

Just so you know:
This version is incompatible with the current SingleClick server when you use the encryption plugin.