Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Search found 2 matches

by hb307
2004-10-21 18:41
Forum: Old messages
Topic: Different behaviour possible?
Replies: 3
Views: 3940

Hi/2 Jeremy,

the result would be that if the user won't respond VNC would establish the connection after the timeout, right?

I could live w/it.
by hb307
2004-10-21 11:31
Forum: Old messages
Topic: Different behaviour possible?
Replies: 3
Views: 3940

Different behaviour possible?

Hi fellas!

I'd like to know whether it is possible to achieve the following running vncserver as service and

a) prompt the user for take-over if a user is logged on

b) if nobody is logged on just take over?