Hi/2 Jeremy,
the result would be that if the user won't respond VNC would establish the connection after the timeout, right?
I could live w/it.
Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Search found 2 matches
- 2004-10-21 18:41
- Forum: Old messages
- Topic: Different behaviour possible?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3940
- 2004-10-21 11:31
- Forum: Old messages
- Topic: Different behaviour possible?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3940
Different behaviour possible?
Hi fellas!
I'd like to know whether it is possible to achieve the following running vncserver as service and
a) prompt the user for take-over if a user is logged on
b) if nobody is logged on just take over?
I'd like to know whether it is possible to achieve the following running vncserver as service and
a) prompt the user for take-over if a user is logged on
b) if nobody is logged on just take over?