I have made a topic some time ago where I suggested that you should be able to have some pool in the repeater where you can "chose" from or add some extra unique ID or IP as you suggest to this connectline.
This would made this much more usefull than it is.
Do you want to have it on the Linux ...
After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome
Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078
Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome
Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078
Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Search found 9 matches
- 2009-06-22 22:20
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Possible?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 51928
- 2009-06-22 21:56
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Possible?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 51928
Re: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Poss
I certainly agree with that, that's the reason why I've started this thread. But I see no solution so far.Matts wrote:This would be a great feature !!
Hope team members will consider this feature useful and implement it some way some time.
- 2009-06-15 13:08
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Possible?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 51928
Re: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Poss
Sainsuper
hi think that you don't need the repeater feature for your network ...
I think I *DO* need a repeater since I want to share a single port which isn't blocked by destination by local admins of users I'm willing to help.
There's a lot of networks that prohibit outgoing TCP calls to ...
hi think that you don't need the repeater feature for your network ...
I think I *DO* need a repeater since I want to share a single port which isn't blocked by destination by local admins of users I'm willing to help.
There's a lot of networks that prohibit outgoing TCP calls to ...
- 2009-02-09 22:35
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: Wanted: "DisableEffects=" for SC
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2153
Wanted: "DisableEffects=" for SC
RealVNC has got nifty command-line switches to disable the controlled PCs visual effects:
... RemoveWallpaper=1 RemovePattern=1 DisableEffects=1 ...
It would be great if SC had the same capabilities.
NB: RealVNC free edition sources are freely available for download. Free edition can do ...
... RemoveWallpaper=1 RemovePattern=1 DisableEffects=1 ...
It would be great if SC had the same capabilities.
NB: RealVNC free edition sources are freely available for download. Free edition can do ...
- 2009-02-09 22:30
- Forum: SC
- Topic: "DisableEffects" feature for SC
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2677
Re: "DisableEffects" feature for SC
Now that you've informed me, that this feature is missing, I'll certainly post a feature request. 
- 2009-02-09 21:16
- Forum: SC
- Topic: "DisableEffects" feature for SC
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2677
"DisableEffects" feature for SC
Hi.
I was wondering if UltraVNC SC supports temporary disabling of screen effects (fading menus, etc.).
For example, these are RealVNC options that help a lot during single-click sessions:
... RemoveWallpaper=1 RemovePattern=1 DisableEffects=1 ...
Anyone knows of similar stuff for SC?
I was wondering if UltraVNC SC supports temporary disabling of screen effects (fading menus, etc.).
For example, these are RealVNC options that help a lot during single-click sessions:
... RemoveWallpaper=1 RemovePattern=1 DisableEffects=1 ...
Anyone knows of similar stuff for SC?
- 2009-02-07 13:48
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Possible?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 51928
Re: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Poss
no protocol change, only port change.
direct over 5900
reverse over 5500
redge ,
forgive me my stupidity. Does what you said mean that a working configuration may be produced right now by just swapping port numbers?
What about current SC which doesn't support -proxy option the way I described ...
direct over 5900
reverse over 5500
redge ,
forgive me my stupidity. Does what you said mean that a working configuration may be produced right now by just swapping port numbers?
What about current SC which doesn't support -proxy option the way I described ...
- 2009-02-07 04:17
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Possible?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 51928
Re: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Poss
redge, can you briefly tell what's the protocol difference between forward (Viewer->Server) and reverse (SC->LViewer) call?
- 2009-02-06 05:30
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Possible?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 51928
SC->repeater->LViewer call without using IDs. Possible
Hi UltraVNC team and forum members.
I need to run a multiple set of SC servers connecting to a fewer number of listening viewers residing in my local net with known local IPs.
What I need is something similar to "repeater mode 1" but for SC-LViewer invocation.
So, SC command line is expected to ...
I need to run a multiple set of SC servers connecting to a fewer number of listening viewers residing in my local net with known local IPs.
What I need is something similar to "repeater mode 1" but for SC-LViewer invocation.
So, SC command line is expected to ...