UltraVNC

AFAIK the keys are paired based on initial Date substring in filename.

Was: [BUG] Win7 vncviewer Gray Screen w/1.0.9.6.1 - 1.0.9.6 works ( scenario + steps to reproduce )

I may have got some hints about reproducible gray UVNC Viewer screen issue: Scenario: Windows Vista 64 Home Premium SP2, UAC active, normally run under limited account, having admin access too. Comodo Internet Security suite ( SPFW + HIPS only, UVNC binaries set as system applications ), Avast Free ...

Thanks.
In fact, I know tabbed viewer exists, but I have never used it, neither thought it is able to do it :-)
I was searching for resizing, but results did not lead me toward tabbed viewer.

Would be possible, without affecting compatibility, to implement
any resampling resize algorithm ? At least bilinear as one of simplest.
Possibly in both server and/or viewer side.

Current resize in near to 1.00 ratios is so horrible,
that I never use it, prefering screen scrolling or smaller window.

Well, one can download 7za.exe from 7zip site dowload page<, rename it to 7z.exe and put it there.

Or, copy there 7z.exe from 7-zip folder, should be ok.

Or, replace in PCHW related batch files 7z.exe by pathname of you genuine 7z.exe in 7-zip folder.

In fact, I am not familiar much with Vista and not at all with W2k3 server. I have just played very little with PCHW recently as SC replacement for remote support for my non-IT friends. UVNC servers have an option allow/not to allow remote input. If not allowed, then only looking and advising is ...

I suppose you need PCHW viewer.
PCHW is said to be compatible with UVNC only on helphesk.txt level, not in protocol level. It is different product.

PCHW instalation contains 7z.exe. There is a vulnerability report about 7-zip prior to 4.57 version. Secunia PSI founded 3 location of old vulnerable 7z.exe in pchw folders. When I inspected original name, It was, as I had expected, 7za.exe, i.e. standalone 7z version. Not sure, if 7za is vulnerable ...

Maybe also manage https connection fo online one ?

I understand this. For very most cases this fw behavior makes sense, but here brings troubles. Not very familiar with symantec, using its security suite at common user level in big enterprice enviroment. I know more FW has this problem, at least Kerio/Sunbelt 4.x and Kerio 2.x, maybe comodo 2.4 too ...

It remembers the rule, but for full pathname, not for all files with the same filehash.
So, there is no sense for making permanent rule for one time only program.
Use permit once option, with no rule creation.

Just tried, using even non english keyboard settings.
After set Scroll Lock ON, I am able to send ALT + nnn character code
to a server, as I have just sit there.

That commercial project was mentioned in ultravnce pages several times,
but I have never seen its name.

Is it classified ?

Could be used hostname instead of IP
and used e.g. No-ip.org free dns mapping service ?