UltraVNC

nice stuff well thought out and well executed. Excelent UI

Just the similar sort of UI I would do for uVNC.

you know asking for new features all the time is great and this is a good request but thers only 1 coder at all this maybe two if and when....

I know some java things are happening so watch out for them.

from my pont of view I thing it would be impossible to implement connection via repeater with hostname. This is because Host name is used only via LAN not WAN for wan you use IP/dynDNS only.

From networking point of view its not possible

current 1,0,5 supports host nam within lan and this support ...

sorry mate but I have about 2 dozen mac's in the house but they all from nic cards.

jokes aside

I dont own a mac but I know if you google you shall find. It not that I don't wanna give you the answer besides that it works but If I gave you the answer straight away you wont learn anything in the ...

ah pgmoney man come and give us a hand if you know anyone that can code websites and give us a hand and other coders to help develop ultravnc by commiting oatches and someone to getworking on a embedded server monitor and loads of other stuff, sorry to have hijacked your topic...

Miss having ...

meh?

they make vnc related programs that have source code available and theres plenty of vnc managers out here in this forum that have not been worked on and would make a great integration and only need bringing up to date. and obviously the integration repeaters dont come into this feature request ...

I use SC http://www.uvnc.com/pchelpware/creator/index.html

based on rel 1X

I use the config

http://www.uvnc.com/addons/singleclick.html

sorry never tried that one but the one I use yes its secure adn bever needed a repeater...

also

[topic=5226][/topic]

but I think to get that file you need to ...

JaveViewer does not support encryption...

while we at it can we have transfer speed noted as well?

you navigate in the cmd prompt of windows and issue command on the cmd prompt itself...

to bringh up cmd prompt click start>run>type cmd press enter

it will open dos window

type

cd c:\program files\ultravnc

then type what redge says...

this looks like a dead horse to me...

your right the problem is with the plugin but only because the way you set it up...

the DSM plugin must be the same (same version and same name) on both server and viewer sides and if your selecting to use DSM plugin on Server side the viewer must also use it.

the same applies for the rc4.key

the ...

One of the developers no doubt, please try to also understand that this is a spare time project and Im sure if there is a bug then it will be fixed.

It is posted somewhere in this forum I know I read it somewhere could even be a webpage....

But then again I read quite a bit b4 I try to do stuff I havent done b4. invariably the question as been asked and answered.

have you tried with based release 1.00 compiler?

Works for me

slow as hell even with the vnchook.dll but hey dont crash when I connect to my sisters computer over wan

$150 lol, funny guy.

Weird indeed...

Glad it werks

your using the internal IP like you said, for external connections back to that pc use the external ip or dyndns or no-ip host name.

of course forward the ports to the internal ip where the viewr is running

sc does a reverse connection thats why u use port 5500.

Internal IP 192.x.x.x will only ...

search and u shall find

[topic=10266][/topic]

you can all ways report post and ask for Redge to reply.

Or PM devs are too busy and I wont recommned it

I recon one of the senior guys like Bevtech know how to if it is possible.

I recon your going about it the wrong way. 1 Server can take multiple connections. but hey...

besides starting multiple instances of SC the only other option that springs to mind is share server option, but I suppose thats not what u looking for.

I recon this is a question for Redge... or maybe a dev Rudi or Ultrasam.

Im no expert here but each Tech can either have theire own SC set up with theire dyndns or no-ip port combo or you can have a SC with al theire IP's/ports combo.

1)Helpdesk.txt

[HOST]
Tech name 1
-connect tech.dyndns.org:5500 -noregistry

--------------------------------------------------

2 ...

I made a SC the way the intructions say. (based on REL 1.00)

It werks great so that I connect to my mum/sister's machines which have Vista running on them.

I did not use anything special or did anything different.

They did have to get it past UAC/Firewall that was the hard part.

either way I ...

yes the other line is correct.

All you need here is to ensure that the rc4.key is same on custom.zip file and also that your MSRC4Plugin.dsm is same version also in both sides custom.zip and viewer directory.

You can use the current MSRC4Plugin-122.dsm rename it to MSRC4Plugin.dsm and place a copy ...

I suppose you forwarded ports on router as well?

Ports on the router must be forwarded do that a connection can reach the IP of the Viewer.

You coud just also try Redge suggestion as either a permanent solution or to see if your doing something wrong since thats a ready solution that does not ...

Thank you for your fast response, i've done what the site says. I've tried using it w/out an ID leaving my helpdesk.txt file as follows.

[HOST]
Agent Support - No Encryption
-connect 192.168.1.102:5500 -noregistry


This 192.168.1.102 IP is your internal IP you cannot use that to connect ...

Never used or tried using an ID but I did use dyndns address on helpdesk.txt and relevant ports DSM plugin and RC4.key.

Forwarded ports 5500 to viewer address on router, simple really all instructions followed as explained here.

[topic=4606][/topic]

Either idea of drop down menu or icons for each computer are great to a certain number of machines when this grows it becomes harder to manage on a drop down menu.

with the icons style you can separate them by groups or sites.

I havent designed that part yet and any designs are just suggestions ...

Well I am not even done on the part where it shows Viewer side of this.

Killing Business software that competes? I dont get it, after all theres vnc related products already that are free and add on to uvnc... this would be like u said bringing it internally, all of it not just this.

Surelyy ...

Vote and leave a commnet on topic in link pls