Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Search found 6 matches
- 2008-04-15 15:44
- Forum: VNC-related products
- Topic: TeamViewer
- Replies: 31
- Views: 77608
Re: TeamViewer - Free Desktop sharing
Ah ok, thats too bad. At least the 2x code is still up which has some nice features. It just needs some sort of repeater wrapper implemented which was formally done by the dyngate piece which was closed source. I noticed the recent post about Yama which appears to do just that. Hopefully someone can ...
- 2008-04-15 15:17
- Forum: VNC-related products
- Topic: TeamViewer
- Replies: 31
- Views: 77608
Re: TeamViewer - Free Desktop sharing
Is the source code for TeamViewer 3 available for download? Does the new version not have any VNC code anymore?
- 2007-04-10 12:37
- Forum: SCIII
- Topic: Stupid question
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9477
Re: Stupid question
Thank you snobs. As far as encryption goes. Does using SSL only create a 'gap' at the repeater where both ends are unencrypted? That is how I perceived it where using RC4 is true end2end. Or am I wrong?
- 2007-03-23 01:00
- Forum: SCIII
- Topic: Stupid question
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9477
Re: Stupid question
Actually I have my answer. Simply use RC4 Encryption with a new key to ensure end2end encryption should protect againts certain attacks. If someone could post snobs "create your own certificate" util I would feel much more confident in implementing. Thanks
- 2007-03-21 18:49
- Forum: SCIII
- Topic: Stupid question
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9477
Re: Stupid question
Is there any way to restrict which addresses are allowed to connect from a vncviewer_ssl without breaking the server side connection, since they both connect over port 443?
- 2007-03-21 16:41
- Forum: SCIII
- Topic: Stupid question
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9477
Stupid question
I have things working fine using a repeater. What I have concerns about is that during my testing when I connect to the repeater using 'vncviewer_ssl.exe' I do not have to authenticate myself. What would prevent an attacker from connection to a repeater and simply attempting to connect to random ID ...