UltraVNC

Using the Repeater on your own LAN, ther is no issue of monthly traffic not and issue of speed. But having the Repeater on a remote web server, you have both monthly traffic issue and probably speed. Personaly, I don't like the idea of open oprts in my LAN I don't like too much the idea of a machine ...

thanks the only drawback is (that's what I was reading in the forum) that using mode2, the traffic goes through the Repeater rather than using the repeater to initiate the connection. If I'm not wrong, the NH (Nat Helper - the former solution) used to only initiate the connection between the two ...

Thank you again petoulachi, I think that Repeater is not the solution for you, as you seems to need to take remote control whenever you want and without any action of the server. You need to have the VNC Server to wait everytime for a connection, and Repeater is not made for that. Actually no - I ...

WOW... thank you very much petoulachi. Just when I got totally convinced its not doable to use the PHWare the way I want I got your reply. I'll now get to work on it but I wanted to ask one last question about the concept if you guys don't mind: Why using that strange "inverse connection" concept ...

sorry guys, a little confused with all those options, I wanted to have something clear before I dig deeper and deeper. I'm usin UVNC for about a year now to connect to all computers in my lan with a great success. I did try once to connect to other computers through the internet using the NAT2NAT ...