It occurs to me I'm asking an awful lot of 'why' questions lately. I can't help it. I look through the FAQs and I don't see many explanations why things are the way they are. And most of the questions I have begin with 'why'.
Anyway, I'd really like to offer remote adminsitration to Windows users who are behind NAT but without making things complicated for them. I want to run Linux because my vncviewer would have to be in a DMZ. No way I'm putting Windows in a DMZ. That's just crazy.
But everywhere I turn there's some compatibility issue or other. It's crazy. What's the issue here?
Yeah I looked at that NAT-to-NAT connector and my eyes glazed over. I don't trust complexity. And where's the source code to it?
What would it take get all the UltraVNC features buildable cross--platform? Could we just have one version of the VNC suite? If you need a volunteer to code it, I'd give it a shot. But first give me an idea what I'm getting into. What's the history behind this current situation?
After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is welcome
Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078
Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
Feedback is welcome
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is welcome
Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078
Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
Feedback is welcome
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Why is UltraVNC only on Windows?
Why is UltraVNC only on Windows?
Fight Internet censorship! Public Web gateway to Freenet: http://blcss.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl
Re: Why is UltraVNC only on Windows?
I have had success running uvnc 1.02 in fedora core 6 with wine..
Bevtech
Windows XP Home, Pro SP2, Windows 2003 SBS server SP2 (EN), Windows Media Center Editon 2005, Windows Vista Home Premium, Fedora Core 6, Windows 9X, PcHelpWare 1.0, UltraVNC 1.0.8.2
User not developer ;)
Windows XP Home, Pro SP2, Windows 2003 SBS server SP2 (EN), Windows Media Center Editon 2005, Windows Vista Home Premium, Fedora Core 6, Windows 9X, PcHelpWare 1.0, UltraVNC 1.0.8.2
User not developer ;)
Re: Why is UltraVNC only on Windows?
I had success in Mandriva 2006 running ultravnc server and viewer with wine, but single click don't work.