After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.2.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38083
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Old MSLogon

Should you have problems with the MS logon plugin, here's the place to look for help or report issues
Post Reply
mfo2
8
8
Posts: 20
Joined: 2004-09-02 14:48

Old MSLogon

Post by mfo2 »

Hi,

Leaving aside the cool MS Logon II and testing the "old" MSLogon.
What is the meaning of the Group 3 = Read Only ?
I was expecting that if I put someone in this domain Group, when connected to the vnc server he'll have view only right (no click, no keyboard) but it's not what I'm observing.
It does give access but the same type of access as Group 1 and 2.

What am I doing wrong ?

Thanks

Marc
mfo2
8
8
Posts: 20
Joined: 2004-09-02 14:48

Post by mfo2 »

By the way, it works perfectly in MSLogon II, checking only View in the group ACL permits only a viewing of the remote computer (good work Martin).

Marc
ipsec
200
200
Posts: 565
Joined: 2004-09-20 18:56
Contact:

Post by ipsec »

part of the fixes they implimented in MS logon II was that. The idea was there, however it wasnt really truely working right and thats why they came out with the other MSLogon.

a lot of people had that problem, so its not just you.
mfo2
8
8
Posts: 20
Joined: 2004-09-02 14:48

Post by mfo2 »

Thank you for your answer !
Post Reply