After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome
Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078
Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome
Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864
Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078
Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Windows XP SP2 And groups
Windows XP SP2 And groups
Hi there,
A friend of mine and me are trying to establish a connection via Ultr@VNC RC18 en the new MSLogon. The get the connection is not the problem. But it wont authenticate. I used machine\group en just group, neither worked. The account used is valid because it can logon locally on the system. Both system run Windows XP Professional SP2. When I use the normal MSLogon the authentication goes wel. Only then the problem is the even if I use a groupname in option 3 (View Only), you still have full control.
Could you guys help me out a bit?
Thx.
A friend of mine and me are trying to establish a connection via Ultr@VNC RC18 en the new MSLogon. The get the connection is not the problem. But it wont authenticate. I used machine\group en just group, neither worked. The account used is valid because it can logon locally on the system. Both system run Windows XP Professional SP2. When I use the normal MSLogon the authentication goes wel. Only then the problem is the even if I use a groupname in option 3 (View Only), you still have full control.
Could you guys help me out a bit?
Thx.
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6952
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
You need to have two Seperate groups.Arbeider wrote:Well, Th egroup I created is called UltraVNC. There are two users in it. One is local Admin the other is a normal user. When the normal users logs on he too has full access. I tried it with only a regular user in the group, same problem, still full access.
One - UltraVNCAdmin
Two - UltraVNCUser
Put the admin in the Admin group, user in the user group.
Specify on group 3 on the ms logon UltraVNCUser group and you should be good to go.
You were really close

Thx IPSec, I will try this tonight (It's now 7:57 am). So if I'm correct this is what happens. If there's a group that has a local admin in it (and is set in option 3 in mslogon) all the other users (even guests) in that group have full access too?
Because that's what's happening to me. But again, tonight I will try what you suggested.
Because that's what's happening to me. But again, tonight I will try what you suggested.
Basically what I think is occuring is the following -
Since you only had one group (Ultra VNC) because you had to put that group name in both the MS logon 1 and 3 you are basically saying give them full and view only access.
It gave the Group the highest access available which is full control... It didnt matter what the actual users privelages were because it was part of that single group.
If you seperate the groups - e.g. VNCAdmin / VNCUser. Specify the admin for the admin group and the person in the user group. You can now explicitly state
VNCAdmin to have full access under the MSLogon 1 or 2 groups and VNCUser under the number 3 (Read Only) group.
That would segregate the distinction in the program for you by group rather than sharing the one Ultra VNC group
Hope that makes sense... but if it doesnt just create two groups, put the admin in one, the user in another and try it.. I think thats what you are going for.
Since you only had one group (Ultra VNC) because you had to put that group name in both the MS logon 1 and 3 you are basically saying give them full and view only access.
It gave the Group the highest access available which is full control... It didnt matter what the actual users privelages were because it was part of that single group.
If you seperate the groups - e.g. VNCAdmin / VNCUser. Specify the admin for the admin group and the person in the user group. You can now explicitly state
VNCAdmin to have full access under the MSLogon 1 or 2 groups and VNCUser under the number 3 (Read Only) group.
That would segregate the distinction in the program for you by group rather than sharing the one Ultra VNC group

Hope that makes sense... but if it doesnt just create two groups, put the admin in one, the user in another and try it.. I think thats what you are going for.
Hi there,
No IPSec, I never put the same group in 1 and 3.
I tried the following last night: I created a group called ViewVNC and I added a user Mark in it. I removed Mark as a regular user so the only group Mark is in is ViewVNC. This group I put under 3 in the Microsoft Logon, so it should be View Only. But it still has Full Access. I'm not using a domain so maybe there's a problem with that. I only enable local on group 3 which is ViewVNC. Are there any registry settings I need to change? Does this only work with MS Logon V2?
AAARGGGGHHHH!!!! (Sry, just needed to cool off)
No IPSec, I never put the same group in 1 and 3.
I tried the following last night: I created a group called ViewVNC and I added a user Mark in it. I removed Mark as a regular user so the only group Mark is in is ViewVNC. This group I put under 3 in the Microsoft Logon, so it should be View Only. But it still has Full Access. I'm not using a domain so maybe there's a problem with that. I only enable local on group 3 which is ViewVNC. Are there any registry settings I need to change? Does this only work with MS Logon V2?
AAARGGGGHHHH!!!! (Sry, just needed to cool off)
I don't know if this is good news or bad news for you, but I'm working on version 3 of the new mslogon.
This will allow for configuration of any number of groups/users.
You can set any group/user to view only.
The config window is just the familiar security property page that is also used with any other securable object in Windows:

This should work under NT4, W2K, WXP and W2K3 in service mode.
I'll then try to extend this to app mode and W9x.
This will allow for configuration of any number of groups/users.
You can set any group/user to view only.
The config window is just the familiar security property page that is also used with any other securable object in Windows:

This should work under NT4, W2K, WXP and W2K3 in service mode.
I'll then try to extend this to app mode and W9x.