After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Repeater behind MS AppProxy without basic auth

Post Reply
Prisma
100
100
Posts: 321
Joined: 2005-10-27 15:50

Repeater behind MS AppProxy without basic auth

Post by Prisma »

Hello Rudi,

I hope you're doing great! We use a rather old version, very stable, so no reason to post and ask things.

But now we would be interested to protect our repeater with SAML or openIDconnect with an IdP. But, as we found out, this was way too complicated (and would be much work for you). This is all is not necessary, because the used IdP is Microsoft. And Microsoft has its MS AppProxy. A very easy to install and very small Software for the target (repeater-)server. This Proxy enables modern authentication for legacy webservices. Therefore perfectly designed for repeater and others.

Now the question:
I'm curious if it would be possible to completely disable basic auth for repeater, because repeater would have his own doorkeeper sitting in front of it for authentication?

Entering an empty password would be no solution, because we need no username/password prompt at all. Or would changing the password to empty disable basic auth completely?
Post Reply