After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.2.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38083
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Search found 6 matches

by dburanen
2008-01-30 22:31
Forum: SC
Topic: basing on version 1.02 or 1.04?
Replies: 0
Views: 1676

basing on version 1.02 or 1.04?

It's been asked, but I see no answer. Is it possible to use this app to make an sc based on 1.02 or 1.04 of uvnc?

The old one doesn't work with the latest iteration of Ubuntu without some adjustments.

[topic=10451][/topic]
by dburanen
2008-01-30 22:20
Forum: SC
Topic: Bug/Feature Request: Upgrade RFB Protocol from 3.16 to 3.6
Replies: 8
Views: 15462

Re: Bug/Feature Request: Upgrade RFB Protocol from 3.16 to

Is there anyway we can create a new SC that uses 3.3 or 3.8 version of vnc as the backend instead of the old version that SC uses?

Are we at the mercy of uvnc devs? I haven't heard any word and it looks like they're pushing pchelpware. Are we screwed? Is it time to look to another VNC app to ...
by dburanen
2007-11-03 05:41
Forum: SC
Topic: SC and VISTA <-- Making it work!
Replies: 11
Views: 20343

Re: SC and VISTA <-- Making it work!

While PCHelpware works Bev, PCHelpware does not work in Linux where SC did. Here's hoping for an updated SC.
by dburanen
2007-11-03 05:40
Forum: SC
Topic: SingleClick with UltraVNC 1.02?
Replies: 0
Views: 1938

SingleClick with UltraVNC 1.02?

Anyone know how I can get a singleclick .exe based on UltraVNC 1.02 using my helpdesk.txt?

The old rc23 and rel1.00 don't work with the latest vncviewer on linux.
by dburanen
2007-07-02 23:04
Forum: SC
Topic: Bug/Feature Request: Upgrade RFB Protocol from 3.16 to 3.6
Replies: 8
Views: 15462

Re: Bug/Feature Request: Upgrade RFB Protocol from 3.16 to

I posted this bug report on the viewer to see if they can support older RFB versions, but a new version of SC based on 1.02 or 1.03 would be real nice.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour ... bug/123631
by dburanen
2007-07-02 21:19
Forum: SC
Topic: Bug/Feature Request: Upgrade RFB Protocol from 3.16 to 3.6
Replies: 8
Views: 15462

Bug/Feature Request: Upgrade RFB Protocol from 3.16 to 3.6

I think the RFB version is preventing my viewer from working correctly.

The latest stable, UltraVNC 1.02, supports RFB protocol 3.6. I can see this by clicking 'add new client' from the ultravnc server and connecting to my listening vncviewer. When I use SC, I see that it uses 3.16.

The whole ...