UltraVNC

Just noticed that the changes of this version are missing in the installer.

Thank you for the update!

Well, yes, actually I meant if there is a way for devs to get a new certificate

Hi, I just noticed that when I use the JV to login to my UVNC server, the first message I get is telling me that the certificate is valid only until feb. 2008. Is there a way to get a newer certificate, as the outdated certificate has to be approved on every PC/browser that's used to long. Thank you ...

I definitely prefer the *.
IMO the | look like a graphical glitch...

That's a really great and very detailed explanation by CarlRodabaugh, that IMO deserves a place in the FAQ !

add Unicode as base of UltraVNC 2 code support. Definitely. Maybe we should even think about the server binary only compatible with NT platform (complete unicode). AFAIK there is something like a Unicode addon for Win9x platforms (haven't used any 9x for quite a long time, so I'm not sure about ...

Rudi De Vos wrote:3 weeks Holliday

Have a great time ! You really deserve it

*Do we maintain compatibility ? *Realvnc 4.0 base ? Best parts of code are in the enterprise version.. IMO it would be desirable to keep compatibility as long as possible I'm not familiar with the underlying protocols, but isn't it e.g. possible to introduce some new flags, opcodes or similar for ...

Good to see that you've updated your builds to V1.00

Using IJL sounds like a very good idea, and many sytems will benefit of this improvement (CPUs without MMX and/or SSE are rare these days) !

Looking forward to the sources.

btw: isn't the UVNC dev team looking for some reinforcement ?

Sounds like a good and useful idea. +1

Actually what scovel is saying (at least I assume that) is that, no matter what news Longhorn brings to graphics rendering, it really won't affect UVNC. UVNC doesn't do any rendering, it just takes the already processed video data of the remote machine "just before it is sent to the monitor" (very ...

I just noticed that there are some diffs between my local (changed) sources and CVS whose purpose I was not aware of, and found out that there are some typos in CVS that I apparently fixed locally some time ago :P It's in \winvnc\winvncsc\videodrivercheck.cpp line 213 ff ('Driver EXIST', 'Driver ...

Instead of thinking about all those bugfixes (who cares if the server crashes sometimes, one can set it as service with automatic restart) I think that the developers should think even about changing the interface... You're kidding, aren't you ? Seriously, I also like those suggestions, but as UVNC ...

TightVNC have this feature pop up help hints. UltraVNC one day but make bigger size application ? Well, yes, surely it would increase the size of the app, but who actually cares? We are talking about a few hundred kb (even MB wouldn't matter) in a time where almost every up-to-date cell phone has ...

That shouldn't be a security problem either, as AFAIK there are additional checks to block possible intruders.

I second this request.

njc wrote:Rudi,

Version information incorrect!

File Version reports 1.0.0.18
About Box reports 1.0.0 TEST19

Now that you mention it: the version number in the winvnc.rc file also states 19.6 after the latest update

Hmm, FT is indeed more intuitive if you leave it horizontal.
You could change to >> arrows to vertical ones , but it doesn' really improve things.

However, I can imagine that building sliders etc. without using MFC is quite a lot of work.
On the other hand, why not use MFC ?

I like them

As expected, the client disconnected part way through the install. Somewhat unexpectedly the Setup locked up on the Server end too, leaving an empty "Setup" window on the desktop. A subsequent reinstall without VNC connected cleaned everything up. I've had the same problem many times, and it was ...

Not related to UVNC, but still might be helpful:

http://dslreports.org/wakeup
(never actually tried it though)

Just for the record: RC20 solved my problem I posted above (without plugin).

Yeah, thanks, that's what I meant with "playing around a little with..."

I think especially regarding MSlogon you have to carefully choose the correct dlls.

Anonymous wrote:Please check notice
http://www.uvnc.com/index.php?section=19

Code is being rebuild and will be available in cvs around april.

Just to inform you: using Opera (8beta), this page looks very weird.
Actually so weird that you can't really read what it says...

I guess you'd just have to play a little with the project dependencies to include the various libraries directly into the exe.
But you don't really gain anything by doing that.

If you connect using DSMPlugin 1.1.5 on the VNC viewer, to a VNC server using DSMPlugin 1.1.4, open Admin Properties, choose DSMPlugin 1.1.5 and hit the Configuration button, the VNC server crash, sometimes crashing the W2K also. If you open Admin Properties locally, everything works just fine. I ...

Yes, indeed

NightRyder wrote: ... or maybe thats just me.

Same here, so ...me too

Well, I know and use DUMeter too, and I like it, but it doesn´t do the same thing as the feature I requested. DUMeter displays the entire traffic of the network adapter, not only traffic caused by UVNC (or any other app). So if there is any other traffic (downloads, LAN-traffic etc.), it´s i ...

Well, the topic says it: IMO it would be nice to have the current (and maybe also average) file transfer speed displayed somewhere in the file transfer window.